Halcon Construction

Halcon, Telecom Engineering

Halcon Construction Services How the US Federal Communications Commission got rid of the ‘telephone monopoly’

How the US Federal Communications Commission got rid of the ‘telephone monopoly’

The Federal Communications Authority’s (FCC) rulemaking authority, the Office of the Inspector General, has found that the FCC made “significant” errors in its investigation into the telecommunications commission, which oversaw the construction of the nation’s first fiber-optic cable.

The inspector general report is the first to highlight significant failures by the FCC in its probe into the oversight of the telecommunications industry, the FCC said in a statement on Thursday.

The agency is “shocked and disappointed” by the inspector general’s findings, it added.

The report says the inspector group found “significant problems” with the agency’s investigation of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which oversaw construction of a fiber-to-the-node cable that connected AT&T’s cable systems to customers’ homes and businesses.

The audit also found that “multiple key NTIA personnel and senior agency officials failed to take necessary actions” in the case of the NTIA’s oversight of AT&Ts construction.

The NTIA has since been shut down, according to FCC documents.

The office of inspector general was formed in 2007 to investigate the oversight process of federal agencies, such as the Department of Energy and the Office, but it has not conducted an independent review of the AT&ts construction of its fiber-networking network.

The new report, released in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by The Hill, does not address whether AT&t violated the law in its construction of fiber-based communications infrastructure.

“While the NTIC’s role is critical to the completion of the project, there are also other key NTIC personnel, including some who are directly responsible for the construction, who are not currently serving as NTIC employees,” the report said.

The watchdog group also found the NTI’s chief technology officer “did not adequately assess the risk of adverse impacts to NTIC operations and facilities in the NTIP and did not adequately address the risk that any of its employees might lose their jobs in the event of a failure of the installation of the fiber-coax cable,” the watchdog said.

“The NTIC did not take appropriate corrective actions to address the NTIS’ concerns regarding the NTIs failure to adequately mitigate the risks.”

AT&s construction of cable-to, copper-to and wireless networks is also being investigated.

The company has been facing criticism over the construction process in which it has hired contractors and laid the groundwork for its fiber optic network.

While AT& touts the success of its network, critics are concerned about the impact of the rollout on AT& customers’ ability to access their services.

“AT&Ts failure to ensure that it properly considered all the impacts of its construction on the Internet access needs of AT customers will negatively affect AT&tm ability to provide the most affordable and effective Internet access services to customers and negatively impact the viability of its investment,” the inspector report said in the release.

AT& is under scrutiny for its failure to provide a detailed analysis of its cost and delivery timeline.

The firm is under fire for its lack of transparency in the rollout of its cable-based network, which was first announced in 2015.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently called for AT& to provide an accounting of the cost of its installation, but the company has refused to provide such documents.

AT & t has also faced a barrage of criticism for its handling of customer complaints related to the fiber optic rollout.

AT’ s fiber-powered fiber network has faced complaints about a “black box” in its customer service center that is used to track customers’ access to the network.

AT customers have complained that they can’t log on to the AT’s website to check their service or to cancel their service, and AT&’s billing system doesn’t offer a way for customers to opt out of the network’s service altogether.

AT has also said that it has been forced to stop providing AT& s wireless services to consumers after it was found that customers who used the network were being charged higher rates than those who were not using the network, The Hill reported in March.

TopBack to Top